Difference between revisions of "False Claims Act"

5,972 bytes added ,  00:36, 20 November 2021
Line 153: Line 153:


The statute of limitations for a [https://www.zuckermanlaw.com/false-claims-act-whistleblower-retaliation-lawyer/ False Claims Act whistleblower retaliation case] is '''three years.'''
The statute of limitations for a [https://www.zuckermanlaw.com/false-claims-act-whistleblower-retaliation-lawyer/ False Claims Act whistleblower retaliation case] is '''three years.'''
='''Pleading Qui Tam False Claims Act Case in Detail'''=
False Claims Act qui tam actions must meet the heightened pleading requirement set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b).  In other words, a '''qui tam relator''' must “state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b).  The complaint must “identify ‘the who, what, when, where, and how of the misconduct charged,’ as well as ‘what is false or misleading about [the purportedly fraudulent] statement, and why it is false.’” ''Cafasso ex rel. United States v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.'', 637 F.3d 1047, 1055 (9th Cir. 2011)
Note though that in the Ninth Circuit, the relator need not “identify representative examples of false claims to support every allegation.” ''Ebeid ex rel. U.S. v. Lungwitz'', 616 F.3d 993, 998 (9th Cir. 2010).  Similarly, in the Eleventh Circuit, there is no requirement for a qui tam relator to provide exact billing data. ''Clausen v. Lab. Corp. of Am.'', Inc., 290 F.3d 1301, 1312 & n.21 (11th Cir. 2002).  Rather, a complaint must contain “some indicia of reliability” that a false claim was actually submitted. Clausen, 290 F.3d at 1311. “For instance, a relator with first-hand knowledge of the defendant’s billing practices may possess a sufficient basis for alleging that the defendant submitted false claims.” ''United States ex rel Patel v. GE Healthcare, Inc.'', No. 8:14-cv-120-T-33TGW, 2017 WL 4310263, at *6 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2017).
“An FCA claimant is not required to show `the exact content of the false claims in question’ to survive a motion to dismiss, as `requiring this sort of detail at the pleading stage would be one small step shy of requiring production of actual documentation with the complaint, a level of proof not demanded to win at trial and significantly more than any federal pleading rule contemplates.'” ''United States v. Executive Health Resources, Inc.'', 196 F.Supp.3d 477, 492 (E.D.Pa. 2016) (citing Foglia, 754 F.3d at 156); Gohil, 96 F.Supp.3d at 519 (“[A relator] is not required to plead the details of any false claim submitted for payment[.]”)
But it is critical to connect the fraud scheme to the submission of false claims.  In ''United States ex rel. Booker v. Pfizer, Inc.'', 847 F.3d 52, 58 (1st Cir. 2017), the First Circuit held that “aggregate [information] reflecting the amount of money expended by Medicaid” on off-label prescriptions was “insufficient on its own to support a[] [False Claims Act] claim” because it did not show “an actual false claim made to the [G]overnment.”
To satisfy Rule 9(b), the whistleblower “must provide ‘particular details of a scheme to submit false claims paired with reliable indicia that lead to a strong inference that claims were actually submitted’”; “[d]escribing a mere opportunity for fraud will not suffice.” ''See Foglia v. Renal Ventures Mgmt.'', 754 F.3d 153, 157-58 (3d Cir. 2014).
As summarized in ''United States of America ex rel. Donna Rauch v. Oaktree Medical Centre, P.C.'', No. 6:15-cv-01589 (D.SC March 5, 2020), the Fourth Circuit applies the following Rule 9(b) standard:
“To satisfy Rule 9(b), a plaintiff asserting a claim under the [FCA] `must, at a minimum, describe the time, place, and contents of the false representations, as well as the identity of the person making the misrepresentation and what he obtained thereby.'” ''Nathan'', 707 F.3d at 455-56 (quoting ''United States ex rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.'', 525 F.3d 370, 379 (4th Cir. 2008)). The Fourth Circuit has held that “allegations of a fraudulent scheme, in the absence of an assertion that a specific false claim was presented to the government for payment” are insufficient to meet Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading standard. ''Id.'' at 456. “Instead, the critical question is whether the defendant caused a false claim to be presented to the government, because liability under the [FCA] attaches only to a claim actually presented to the government for payment, not the underlying fraudulent scheme.” ''Id.'' (citing ''Harrison'', 176 F.3d at 785). In the event a relator does not plead with particularity that specific false claims actually were presented to the government for payment, a relator’s complaint may still survive a Rule 9(b) challenge only if it “allege[s] a pattern of conduct that would `''necessarily'' have led[ ] to submission of false claims’ to the government for payment.” ''Grant'', 912 F.3d at 197 (quoting ''Nathan'', 707 F.3d at 457) (alteration and emphasis in original).
A good example of meeting the Rule 9(b) requirement without pleading actual submission of invoices to the government is ''United States ex rel. Saldivar v. Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc.'', 906 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 1269 (N.D. Ga. 2012), a case in which the relator worked for a dialysis service provider and managed the facility’s inventory of two drugs. Based upon the relator’s observations of the inventory, he believed the facility submitted “fraudulent reimbursement claims” by “bill[ing] the government for doses of [drugs] that it received for free.” ''Id.'' Although the relator did not work in the billing department, the court found the relator satisfied Rule 9(b) because his belief was based upon his observation of the facility’s inventory documents and a conversation with “his clinical manager inform[ing] him that those documents were used as the basis upon which [the facility] billed for reimbursement.” ''Id.'' at 1277.
=='''Elements of a False Claims Act Qui Tam Case'''==
A qui tam relator must plead:
#a false statement or fraudulent course of conduct;
#made with [https://www.zuckermanlaw.com/sp_faq/scienter-false-claims-act/ scienter] (intent);
#that was [https://www.zuckermanlaw.com/sp_faq/materiality-false-claims-act/ material];
#causing the government to pay out money or forfeit moneys due.


='''False Claims Act Public Disclosure Bar'''=
='''False Claims Act Public Disclosure Bar'''=