Difference between revisions of "Whistleblower Protection Laws"

Line 31: Line 31:


To prevail under SOX’s whistleblower provision, an employee must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that
To prevail under SOX’s whistleblower provision, an employee must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that
*she engaged in [https://www.zuckermanlaw.com/federal-courts-adopting-administrative-review-boards-broad-interpretation-sarbanes-oxley-protected-conduct/ protected activity];
*they engaged in [https://www.zuckermanlaw.com/federal-courts-adopting-administrative-review-boards-broad-interpretation-sarbanes-oxley-protected-conduct/ protected activity];
*the employer knew that she engaged in the protected activity;
*the employer knew that they engaged in the protected activity;
*she suffered an unfavorable personnel action; and
*they suffered an unfavorable personnel action; and
*the protected activity was a contributing factor in the unfavorable action.
*the protected activity was a contributing factor in the unfavorable action.