Difference between revisions of "Insider Trading"
no edit summary
(Insider Trading) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*trades securities based on tipped information; or | *trades securities based on tipped information; or | ||
*trades securities based on misappropriated information. | *trades securities based on misappropriated information. | ||
== Purpose of Insider Trading Laws == | |||
Insider-trading laws are designed to protect market integrity and prevent individuals from profiting unlawfully. Prosecuting insider-trading violations is a top enforcement priority of the SEC and the agency will bring cases against individuals trading on inside information even when their profits are not relatively insignificant to other [https://www.zuckermanlaw.com/sec-whistleblower-lawyers/sec-sanctions/ areas of enforcement]. | |||
For example, on March 23, 2017, the SEC announced that it settled charges against Steven A. Hartung who allegedly earned '''[/https://whistleblower-rewards-and-protections-wiki.zuckermanlaw.com/index.php/Insider_Trading#:~:text=who%20allegedly%20earned-,%2460%2C000,-on%20a%20family $60,000]''' on a family member’s inside information about Merck & Co. Inc.’s 2014 acquisition of Idenix Pharmaceuticals. The SEC disgorged his gains and Hartung agreed to pay an equivalent penalty and interest for a total settlement of $123,000. While this settlement amount would not qualify a whistleblower for an award under the SEC Whistleblower Program, it nevertheless underscores that the SEC is targeting any individual who trades on inside information – even if it does not result in a multi-million-dollar profit. | |||
== Types of Insider Trading Cases Bought by the SEC == | |||
According to the [https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-basics/glossary/insider-trading SEC’s Insider Trading webpage], the agency has brought insider-trading cases against: | |||
* corporate officers, directors, and employees who traded the corporation’s securities after learning of significant *confidential corporate developments | |||
* friends, business associates, family members, and other ‘tippees’ of such officers, directors, and employees, who traded the securities after receiving such information | |||
* employees of law, banking, brokerage and printing firms who were given such information to provide services to the corporation whose securities they traded | |||
* government employees who learned of such information because of their employment by the government | |||
* other persons who misappropriated, and took advantage of, confidential information from their employers | |||
== SEC Insider Trading Enforcement Actions == | |||
* On September 21, 2016, hedge-fund manager Leon G. Cooperman and his firm, Omega Advisors, were charged with insider trading related to the sale of a company for [https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2016/comp-pr2016-189.pdf '''$650 million''']. According to the SEC’s [https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2016/comp-pr2016-189.pdf complaint], Cooperman learned of Atlas Pipeline Partners’ (“APL”) sale of its natural-gas processing facility from the company’s executive in advance of the public announcement. During this conversation, Cooperman allegedly told the executive that he would not to use the information for trading purposes. Thereafter, the hedge-fund manager purchased millions of dollars worth of APL’s stock, whose value increased by approximately 31% after the sale of the gas-processing facility. The SEC is seeking to disgorge all ill-gotten gains plus interest, penalties, and obtain permanent injunctions against Cooperman and Omega Advisors. | |||
* On May 11, 2017, the SEC charged a former partner at an international law firm and his neighbor with making [https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-100 '''more than $1 million'''] in illicit profits by insider trading around corporate announcements. According to the SEC’s [https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2017/comp-pr2017-100.pdf complaint], the partner accessed confidential documents on his law firm’s internal computer network related to at least 11 impending announcements involving law firm clients. The partner traded with this material nonpublic information and often tipped his neighbor about the information as well. The neighbor similarly traded in company stocks before the announcements were made public. | |||
* On May 24, 2017, the SEC charged a former government employee who tipped a political intelligence consultant about confidential information regarding upcoming decisions by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The consultant relayed this information to analysts at a hedge fund advisory firm that paid him as a consultant. The analysts used the information to trade the stocks of four health care companies and generate [https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-109 '''more than $3.9 million in illicit profits''']. | |||
* On July 12, 2017, the SEC announced charges against a scientist who used inside information about two acquisitions to make approximately [https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-125 '''$120,000 in unlawful profits''']. To avoid detection (unsuccessfully), Mr. Yuan placed the trades using a brokerage account opened in China bearing his mother’s name. The SEC’s investigation revealed several “smoking guns,” including Internet searches conducted by Mr. Yuan about how to evade detection, including a search for “insider trading in an international account.” [https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2017/comp-pr2017-125.pdf Click] here to read the complaint. | |||
* On September 20, 2017, the SEC charged the former CEO of a Silicon Valley-based fiber optics company, Alliance Optics Products, with insider trading in company stock that generated [https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-168 '''$2 million in illicit profits and losses avoided''']. According to the SEC’s complaint, the CEO used secret brokerage accounts in the names of his wife and brother and trade company shares after attending board meetings where confidential information was discussed. In addition, the CEO tipped his brother about the company’s performance prior to earnings announcements as well as prior to an announcement that the company would be acquired by Corning. | |||
Additional recent SEC enforcement actions for insider trading that have resulted in monetary sanctions in excess of $1 million include: | |||
* [https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2012/lr22468.htm SEC v. Thomas D. Melvin, et al.] | |||
* [https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2017/lr23862.htm Securities and Exchange Commission v. Yu-Cheng Lin – $7.3 million] | |||
* [https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2013-2013-42htm SEC v. Sigma Capital Management, LLC – $14 million] | |||